|
Kansas could lose millions over seat belt law |
|
Thursday, 19 March 2009 09:15 |
|
"Kansas' lack of a primary seat belt law could cost the state millions, state Transportation Secretary Deb Miller said Wednesday. While vehicle occupants are required to wear seat belts, officers cannot pull a car over because they spot an adult who is not buckled in. A primary law would allow officers to stop a vehicle if they see someone not wearing a seat belt. The rule is already in effect for drivers younger than 18, but Senate Bill 59 would make the law apply to everyone. If Kansas doesn't enact the law by June 30 it will lose a one-time federal grant of about $11.2 million and another $456,000 annual appropriation, Miller said." Here is another example of the Federal government using money to get a state law passed. Kansas can either pass this seat belt law or they will loose out on the Federal money for highways. Fair or not this seems to be the way our government operates; do what the Federal government wants or you will not receive any funding in this area. Are we all sick of the government telling us how to live our lives yet?
Link
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Excise Tax Causes Spike In Cigarette Prices |
|
Friday, 13 March 2009 10:48 |
|
"This increase is actually part of a federal plan, with the money geared at covering health-insurance for low-income children. While the increase wasn't supposed to happen until April 1st, prices are already jumping as manufacturers prepare to pay their own tax. The key behind the jump is a federal excise tax of $1.00 on tobacco products slated to hit April 1st. That money is expected to help pay for the expansion of SCHIP. But prices are spiking now as manufacturers prepare to pay a floor tax due on April 1." It would appear that smokers have become the easy target to collect more taxes from. The idea of smoking has lost popularity and come under fire in almost all states; smoking bans in public places even outside has occurred all over the US. But, smoking is still legal; just the new, old thing to tax. When all the taxes are said and done will there be any smokers left to tax. Then where will that money come from to fund the health insurance for low-income children? Smoking is a vice and has always had a high sin-tax applied as has alcohol but where is the line in the sand? Are overweight individuals to be taxed next? How about taxing gameboys, Wiis, and iphones; they are the new vices? Yes, smoking has become unpopular but does that justify taxing a legal activity until there are no individuals who can afford to indulge in this one vice? By the way the tax is not just on cigarettes but all tobacco products; chewing tobacco, cigars, pipe tobacco, and cigarettes. Have the people of the US not had enough of this taxing everything until it is priced out of the everyday, ordinary person’s price range? I challenge you (general you) to figure out how much you actually pay in taxes for a week. This includes sales tax, gas tax, income tax, social security tax, export taxes on goods from overseas, the use taxes on phone bills, and all the other taxes that we are accessed but don’t usually notice because they have become part of our lives that we would rather not notice. It comes up to an amazing amount of money. Perhaps it is time to call for an accounting of just exactly where that money is going and why the government keeps needing more and more instead of learning to balance a budget like the rest of us. Link |
|
Read more...
|
|
Kansas legislators push resolution on state sovereignty |
|
Thursday, 12 March 2009 10:25 |
|
“Wilbur said it's directed at federal mandates such as the No Child Left Behind education law and the recently approved economic stimulus act. The education law ordered states to adopt new standards for student achievement but never provided the money to meet the goals, Wilbur said.As for the stimulus plan, "money coming in from the stimulus is going to have all kinds of strings attached," Wilbur said. He said that entices states to become dependent on the federal funds, pressuring states to accept federal rules they wouldn't pass on their own."Basically, it's like economic crack," he said.” I don’t know if this is the answer for getting the Federal government to back down a little on the control they seem to exert over every facet of our lives, but it might be a start. I wish more states would look at this bill and use it to get the government to back off. I know that a few years ago when the Federal government wanted all the states to pass helmet laws for motorcycles Iowa did not and lost a bunch of Federal funding for infrastructure. Money is the catalyst for many of the bills that are passed and for some that fail to pass. Right now we are seeing individuals who just want the Federal government to go away, not become a bigger entity. Fox News did a feature the other night on how many government jobs have been added to some states payrolls to comply with the Federal mandates to receive bailout money. Iowa added 300 government jobs. If I remember correctly around 65% of all jobs in Iowa are considered government jobs. So that would mean that there are only 35% of working Iowan’s paying for the government workers salaries. That doesn’t work out to be a good percentage, does it? Link |
|
Read more...
|
|
Friday, 27 February 2009 10:14 |
|
Well the bailout talk at first was sort of funny with all the applications posted on the internet for regular people applying for a little of that money, but now it has gone way beyond the time for giggling. Trillions of dollars to bail out businesses that are in sad financial states because of their own business practices. Wow, who knew you could make bad business decisions and then have the government come riding in and give you a hand out. Where did the concept of hard, honest work for a buck go? We have a small business and I would bet that the government could care less whether we survive these present economic hard times. We are too small for anyone to care whether we are still here in business tomorrow. And I find myself growing bitter about the idiots who have sucked up the big bucks for years getting my tax money to bail them out when I would probably be hard pressed to get a business loan right now. Thankfully we are pretty much debt free, but like many small businesses we also do not have much put away for a hard patch; we are hanging on hoping everything goes ok and we make it through another month with the bills paid. In our business if we had made some of the decisions the companies that are getting bailed out have made we would just be out of business and looking for jobs somewhere else. I would not expect government or any other entity to come in and give us money to keep going (trust me this would be a nice concept at times). It just doesn’t happen in the world I reside in. I wonder at times what universe does this happen in; and how did we all get transported to that universe? Please transport us back to the US that encourages self-supporting individuals instead of encouraging individuals to look toward the government to cover their mistakes. |
|
Obama Back From His World Tour!!! |
|
Friday, 01 August 2008 12:39 |
|
Obama’s world tour appears to be over for now. Now he is recounting his time in Europe and the Middle East as transcending country lines and healing the world. He is no longer a mere candidate but instead a symbol of something more, greater than just a US political wannabe. "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule it." -- H. L. Mencken “This is the moment the world has been waiting for.” In Obama style he has announced the coming of a new world order with him as the new symbol of hope and change. Apparently Mr. Obama does not realize how sarcastic and cynical the people of the US have become in the last decade. We spend more money on gas than groceries right now, but Obama is only surprised that gas prices rose so fast not that they rose this high? The government is taking fundamental freedoms away from ordinary individuals and Obama wants to take more away and raise taxes to fund socialists programs? Obama was a community organizer in Chicago, so how has Chicago gotten so much better from his community organizing? These words, and yes words count, are straight out of some of the old community organizing books. Some of the phrasing is from Social Psychology books on group think. Are the people of the US smart enough to see through this bullshit? This whole political season is making me tired. The political sites repeat and rephrase the same rhetoric over and over. The same posters defend their candidate and position with the same tired rebuttals. I see no hope or change for the future, just more of the same political entitlement. Political office holding is not about social advancement of the masses it is all about power. And apparently there are some high profile individuals who want Obama in power to advance their own political agenda. Who are these individuals? A junior Senator does not reach this level in the political playing field unless powerful individuals want him there. Who is pulling the strings? Obama would like to compare himself to JFK but I would rather compare whoever is behind Obama to Joe Kennedy; doing anything to get his player elected. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 2 |